Google

Friday, December 01, 2006

Hedge fund managers can make you rich











Hedge fund managers can make you richquicker than just about anyone. Sometimes, they can make you pooreven faster. Just look at Amaranth Advisors LLC, the Greenwich, Connecticut-based hedge fund manager that stumbled over wrong-way bets onnatural gas. Going into September, Amaranth was up 26 percent in2006. By October, it had lost $6.6 billion. The next Amaranth is out there somewhere. Bloomberg News,using data compiled by Chicago-based Hedge Fund Research Inc. andBloomberg, has ranked the world's best-performing hedge funds insix investment strategies: emerging markets, distressed, eventdriven, long/short equity, fixed income and macro. Since 2000, the secretive world of hedge funds has more thandoubled in size. There are now more than 9,000 of these fundswith combined assets of $1.34 trillion. Everyone from Wall Streetchieftains to the stewards of retirement nest eggs is chasingthese funds, which are private pools of capital that allowmanagers to participate substantially in the investment returns theygenerate for clients. Investors poured a record $110.7 billion into these vehiclesduring the first nine months of 2006 -- more than twice what theydid in all of 2005. Since September, Morgan Stanley has boughtstakes in two hedge-fund firms and purchased a third outright.And since late 2005, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has become the largestmanager of hedge fund money, with $29.5 billion in assets,according to HFR and Bloomberg.
Returns Sag
So many hedge funds have crowded into the markets that theindustry is struggling to generate standout profits. As of Sept.30, the average hedge fund was up 7.1 percent in 2006. Investorswould have made more money buying a mutual fund that tracks theStandard & Poor's 500 Index, which returned 8.5 percent throughSeptember. And while hedge funds typically charge a fee of 2percent of assets and take a 20 percent cut of profits, theVanguard Institutional Index Fund charges expenses as low as 0.025percent of assets. As money pours in and returns sag, Theodore Aronson, aprincipal of Philadelphia-based Aronson & Johnson & Ortiz LP,sees potential danger ahead. ``You don't have to go back to thetulip bulb mania to see how things could turn out,'' he says.``It could be ugly.'' Investors are coming to grips with slackening returns. Atthe California Public Employees' Retirement System, Senior InvestmentOfficer Christy Wood says hedge funds may have a hard time hittingher investment goals because of a rise in U.S. Treasury yields.
Hitting Targets
Calpers, which has invested about $4 billion in hedge funds,targets a return of 5 percentage points more than T-bill rates. In2003, that figure was 6 percent. On Nov. 8, with T-bills yielding5.1 percent, it was more than 10 percent. ``It doesn't take a lot of research to realize that you'regoing to have a harder time reaching that today,'' Wood says. Which hedge funds will deliver? One place to look for theanswer is below. There's no guarantee, of course, that thesefunds will make the list next time. ``For the rest of our lives, the developing world will becapturing an ever increasing slice of the global economic pie,''says Scott Peters, co-manager of the $82 million, Sausalito,California-based Tradewinds Fund LP. That theme, playing out in countries from Peru to Pakistan,has fueled white-hot performance of emerging-market hedge funds.
21 Percent Return
Such funds posted an average annualized return of 21 percentduring the three years ended on Sept. 30, more than any othercategory of hedge fund, according to HFR. During the first ninemonths of 2006, they returned 12.4 percent. Peters's fundreturned 54.2 percent annualized over the three years. Zeroing in on one market can bring even greater rewards --and risks. Peters's $132 million Tradewinds Russia Partners I LPreturned 80.2 percent annualized over three years. Peters calls that fund a wager that the political andeconomic landscape in Russia will continue to improve. ``Our bet in Russia has been that it would go from a reallychaotic situation to a less chaotic situation,'' Peters says.``It's actually done better than that.'' To hold down risk,Peters tends to invest in big companies that often have ties tothe government. And he uses no borrowed money. Other markets have proven almost as profitable as Russia. Bythe time Workers' Party candidate Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva donnedBrazil's presidential sash in 2003, many foreign investors hadrun for cover.
Betting on Brazil
Greg Lesko, manager of Deltec Emerging Market Equities LP, a$41 million New York-based fund, and his colleagues insteadpoured 10 percent of the fund's assets into Brazilian bonds thatwere trading for as little as 40 cents on the dollar. ``It was clear to me that Lula was not going to be atraditional leftist,'' Lesko says. In general, Lesko focuses on a dozen or so marketsbenefiting from what he sees as stable political situations,responsible economic policies and healthy competitiveenvironments. He began unloading the Brazilian debt a year or solater at 85-100 cents on the dollar -- when he was confidentenough to shift more heavily into equities. Today, 20.3 percent of Deltec is in Brazilian stocks. Thefund has also built up holdings in Taiwan, at 15.2 percent ofassets, and the Philippines, at 7.4 percent. Deltec was up 29.5percent annualized over the three years. Going against the crowd is the key to market-beating gains.Richard Mashaal opened Senvest Israel Partners LP in April 2003,during a wave of violence between Palestinians and Israelis.``Many stocks were trading below their cash holdings,'' saysMashaal who also runs a long/short equity fund. ``We felt thiswas the deal of a lifetime.''
Vultures Swoop
The fiasco at Enron Corp. has been good to Alan Cohen. SinceEnron went bust in 2001, Cohen, a senior managing director atYork Capital Management LLC, has made a fortune on its bonds. New York-based York Capital, run by Jamie Dinan, has emergedas one of the most-successful hedge-fund vultures. Its York CreditOpportunities Fund, which Cohen manages, posted an averageannualized return of 23.6 percent in the three years ended onSept. 30, according to HFR. In 2001, York bought bonds and shares of AdelphiaCommunications Corp., Tyco International Ltd. and WorldCom Inc --and got hammered when accounting scandals rocked those companies.York's main fund lost 7.1 percent in 2002. The firm held on tomany of those investments and posted a 33.3 percent return in2003. ``Many of these companies have continued to recover andgrow,'' Cohen says. ``We expect more positive developments downthe road.''
Troubled Industries
Hedge funds that trade distressed assets, typically junk bondsand corporate loans, posted an average annualized return of 14.6percent during the three years ended on Sept. 30, according toHFR. During the first nine months of 2006, these funds returned9.8 percent. So many hedge funds are chasing distressedinvestments that returns have withered from 18.9 percent in 2004. Sam DeRosa-Farag, president of New York-based Ore HillPartners LLC, says he's keeping a close eye on the troubledairline and auto industries. Cohen says he's watching them, too. ``You have 80 percent of the industry in trouble. That isquite unusual,'' DeRosa-Farag says of both. ``If you compare thatto the 1980s or 1990s, the pain threshold is much, much higher.'' As of mid-November, the biggest bond market casualty of 2006was Toledo, Ohio-based Dana Corp. The auto parts maker filed forbankruptcy on March 3, with $6.8 billion of debt.
Fallen Angels
More companies are likely to run into trouble soon,according to S&P. As of early October, 38 companies around theworld had lost their investment-grade credit rating in 2006.Forty-one more, with a combined $77.6 billion of debt, were atrisk of landing on the junk-bond heap. Bay Harbour 90-1 Ltd., managed by New York-based Bay HarbourManagement LLC, returned 34.6 percent during the three yearsended on Sept. 30, the best showing among distressed-asset fundsin the U.S., according to HFR. When Mirant Corp. made a $7.86 billion hostile bid for NRGEnergy Inc. in May, Barry Rosenstein, founder of Jana Partners LLC,went to work. Jana and several other hedge funds that boughtshares in Atlanta-based power producer Mirant denounced theacquisition as overpriced. The hedge funds won. Mirant eventually dropped its bid and,to placate investors, agreed to buy back $1.25 billion of stock. Over the past few years, hedge fund managers like Rosensteinhave made headlines -- and lots of money -- by buying stocks andthen pushing for change.
Provocateurs
Event-driven funds such as Jana Partners, which try to profitfrom corporate events such as mergers, acquisitions andbankruptcies, posted an average annualized return of 12.7 percentin the three years ended on Sept. 30, according to HFR. Duringthe first nine months of 2006, they returned 9 percent. As the S&P 500 Index rallied in November, some event-drivenmanagers predicted investor activism might wane. When stockinvestors are making money, it's often hard to rally them. ``The market is doing things on its own now,'' says JeffreyAltman, founder of New York-based Owl Creek Asset Management LP,whose Owl Creek II LP fund returned an annualized 16.3 percent inthe three years ended on Sept. 30, according to HFR. If the goodtimes last, investors may start to frown on hedge fund rabble-rousing, Altman says. Activists may have a harder time making money because somany hedge fund managers are piling on, says Rosenstein, whosefund posted a 19.5 percent annualized return over three years,according to HFR. ``You have a lot of people combing over the same companies,and stocks can be run up too high,'' he says. The plus is that thenew breed of hedge fund activist has provided a shareholder basethat supports corporate change, Rosenstein says.
Activist Action
Rosenstein has teamed up with some of the most-prominentactivists around. He joined billionaire corporate raider-turned-hedge fund manager Carl Icahn in a failed bid to break apart TimeWarner Inc. in 2006. Time Warner stock rose 12.6 percent in 2006through Nov. 8. At Owl Creek, Altman looks for companies that arerestructuring, spinning off units or struggling to boost theirstock price. He made money betting that auto industry suppliersand health insurance providers would ride out turbulence in thoseindustries. He also bought shares of AMR Corp. and Continental AirlinesInc., figuring the airlines would benefit from lower oil prices andrecent concessions from labor unions. ``Airlines are generating tremendous amounts of free cashflow,'' he says.
The Original Hedgers
In a world of rapid-fire traders, Richard Mashaal buys,holds -- and wins. Mashaal, manager of New York-based Senvest Partners LP,began buying shares of Msystems Ltd., a Kfar Saba, Israel-based makerof flash drives, at about $6 in 2001. Mashaal, 41, didn't sellwhen the stock doubled to $12 in 2003 or when it sailed past $30in 2005. Today, his $118 million fund still holds some 85 percentof its original stake in Msystems, whose shares traded at $35.38on Nov. 8. ``When you find a good management team with a good productattacking a growth market, you stick with it,'' Mashaal says. Long/short equity funds, which both buy stocks and wageragainst them, posted an average annualized return of 10.3 percentduring the three years ended on Sept. 30, according to HFR.During the first nine months of 2006, these funds returned 6percent.
Industry Giants
Investors poured more than $30 billion into long/short fundsduring the first nine months of 2006. These funds now sit atop acombined $379.3 billion in assets, more than a quarter of theindustry total. Mashaal garnered a 25.7 percent three-year annualized recordby sussing out beaten-down technology stocks with low price-earningsmultiples, fat cash cushions and attractive prospects. ``We'll buy something that has a 40 trailing P/E, but if welook at where we see it going, it'll have a forward P/E of 10,''Mashaal says. The long/short arena accommodates a variety of investingstyles. Bryant Riley, founder of Los Angeles-based SACC PartnersLP, is an activist whose fund returned 33.3 percent annualizedover three years. ``We take a private equity approach,'' Riley, 39, says. SACCoften demands board seats after building a position in a company.The $118.8 million fund is represented on the boards of 10 ofSACC's 15 core holdings. All of them are microcaps with marketvalues of less than $300 million.
Winning Board Seats
SACC bought shares of Alliance Semiconductor Corp., a Santa Clara,California-based maker of computer memory products, after thecompany's shares had tumbled to less than $1.60 in May 2005. After winning five of seven board seats, Riley and hispartner, John Ahn, ordered management to sell off Alliance'soperating businesses and concentrate on a portfolio ofinvestments it owns. Alliance shares rose to $3.65 on Nov. 8. Its success is such that the fund is changing its name toRiley Investment Partners LP, which will put an end to peopleconfusing the fund with Stamford, Connecticut-based SAC CapitalAdvisors LLC, which was founded by legendary trader Steven Cohen. ``He's unfairly capitalizing on the reputation we've beenbuilding,'' Ahn jokes. ``It's hard to make a buck.'' That's how Donald Brownstein,founder of Stamford, Connecticut-based Structured PortfolioManagement LLC, sums up life these days for hedge funds focusingon the global bond market. Bond funds posted an average annualized return of 7.8percent during the three years ended on Sept. 30, according toHFR. During the first nine months of 2006, they were up 5.9percent.
Fed Headache
The U.S. Federal Reserve has been a big headache for bondinvestors. Since 2004, the Fed has pushed overnight interest rateshigher in an effort to head off a new surge in inflation. It leftthe benchmark federal funds rate unchanged at 5.25 percent on Oct.25. As the funds rate has climbed, so have U.S. Treasury yields.Two-year Treasury yields reached 4.75 percent on Nov. 8, up from3.07 percent in late 2004. Ten-year yields have climbed less, to4.64 percent from 4.22 percent. As a result, investors who borrowat short-term rates to buy bonds make less money on theirinvestments. ``There's been a significant inversion between the overnightrate and the 10-year note,'' Brownstein says. ``It's very hard tomake money in that kind of environment. It's hard for banks. It'shard for everybody.'' Bond managers who focus on mortgage-backed securities haveoutdone many of their peers. Brownstein's $476 million StructuredServicing Holdings LP fund, which specializes in these securities,posted an 8.7 percent average return in the three years ended onSept. 30.
Housing Market
Mortgage bonds are getting riskier now that U.S. home priceshave begun to decline. Banks fashion these securities out ofmortgages and home equity loans. If enough people default on theloans, the securities' credit ratings could suffer. ``The key trend is navigating this slowdown in housing andfinding good opportunities,'' says Tony Lembke, portfolio manager atNew York-based MKP Capital Management LLC. The firm's MKP CreditLP fund, which invests in residential-mortgage-backed securities,posted an average annualized return of 11.7 percent over thethree years. Mortgage Opportunity Fund VI and the Galena Street Fund,both managed by Denver-based Braddock Financial Corp., led fixed-income hedge funds during the three years, according to HFR.Mortgage Opportunity logged an annualized return of 22.2 percentduring that period; it was up 15.4 percent during the first ninemonths of 2006. Galena, which specializes in mortgage-backedsecurities, posted an average annualized return of 15.2 percentover three years and was up 7.1 percent in 2006 through Sept. 30.
The Globalists
What a comedown. The old masters of the hedge fund universe-- macro funds -- can't even beat the S&P 500 Index these days. Macro funds, which trade just about anything, anywhere,posted an average annualized return of 6.7 percent during thethree years ended on Sept. 30, according to HFR. During the firstnine months of 2006, these funds gained 3.2 percent -- less thanthe S&P 500, which rose 7 percent. World markets have been too calm for many macro managers,who tend to thrive on volatility. ``The glory days of macro are over,'' says Paul DeRosa, aprincipal at Princeton, New Jersey-based Mount Lucas ManagementCorp. DeRosa's Peak Partners LP, which posted an annualized three-year return of 13.4 percent, has managed to call recent turningpoints in the markets. The S&P 500 rose 5 percent during the firstfour months of 2006, dropped 2.6 percent through July andadvanced 8.5 percent through Nov. 8. Crude oil started 2006 at $61a barrel, rose to $78 in July and then retreated to $60.
Commodities Play
``We had a good chance in commodities with the run-up inspring and the run-down after July,'' DeRosa says. ``And therewas a chance to catch the rebound in equities.'' James Passin, who manages Firebird Global Fund LP, did evenbetter. Firebird led macro funds in the three years ended onSept. 30, with a 43.6 percent annualized return for its U.S.fund, according to HFR. ``Our theme for the last three years has been naturalresources and the rise of commodities,'' Passin says. New York-based Firebird has been trading everything fromuranium stocks to gold. It's invested in companies with oil or gasconcessions in Africa, Iraq and North Korea, and Passin hastraveled to Papua New Guinea to check oil assets there. One pick, Calgary-based Heritage Oil Corp., wants to pump oilin Lake Albert, between Uganda and the Democratic Republic of theCongo. Another, South Korea-based Finetec Corp., makes cryogenicinsulation used in liquefied natural gas tankers. As investors crowded into commodity trades in 2006, Passinpulled back and loaded up on Japanese construction and technologystocks. Now that North Korea has nuclear weapons, Japan is likelyto embark on a military buildup that will spur industry and theeconomy, he says. Japanese stocks, among them Tokyo-basedMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., accounted for 15 percent of Passin'sholdings in late October. Only 5 percent of the fund's assetswere in U.S. stocks.

No comments: